.
Feedback

Sheriff's Candidate Romar Among Republicans Who Refuse to Sign Dallas County GOP 'Integrity Pledge'

In a news release, the Dallas County Republicans outed three GOP candidates who declined to sign the organization's "integrity pledge."

Dallas County Republican party chairman Mike Elam announced this week that three local GOP primary candidates did not sign the organization's "integrity pledge."

According to Elam's news release, the integrity pledge is "one measure of understanding the intent of party candidates. We ask that they each express support for the eventual primary winner by not opposing him/her as an alternate party candidate in the November general election.”

While the pledge is non-binding, Elam writes, it does serve as an indicator of party loyalty of candidates prior to the June 5 primary election.

The pledge was presented to each of the Republican primary candidates in April. As of May 20, most primary candidates in Dallas County had signed the pledge with two names, specifically, declining to do so — Dallas County Sheriff candidate Jim Romar and the Iowa Senate candidate in District 10, Matt Mardesen.

Gene Krumm, the current Dallas County auditor who is seeking re-election, has also not signed the pledge and has not indicated his intent either way to county party officials.

There are four primary races involving Dallas County on June 5 including:

  1. Iowa Senate District 10 race between Jake Chapman and Matt Mardesen
  2. Iowa Senate District 22 race between incumbent Pat Ward and Jeff Mullen
  3. Dallas County Sheriff race between incumbent Chad Leonard and Jim Romar
  4. Dallas County Auditor race between incumbent Gene Krumm, Vicki Klein, and Troy Wieland.
Beth Dalbey (Editor) May 23, 2012 at 07:01 pm
Why are county sheriffs chosen in partisan elections? Do they enforce the law differently if they're Democrats than they would as Republicans? Does it make more sense for county boards of supervisors to appoint them, the same way a mayor or city council would select a police chief in a municipality?
Kim Yoblonski May 29, 2012 at 12:33 pm
In response to the question of appointment being a better option for Sheriff selection, "Absolutely not!" In a day and age where there are so many reports of law enforcement abuse, I think "the people" should have as much say as possible in the selection of those entrusted with the protection of one's community.
As to whether one's political affiliation should be a major issue in regards to office if Sheriff.... I wouldn't think so.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waukee Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Julia Ziesman June 12, 2013 at 10:28 pm
Could one of the reasons for the population loss in rural Iowa be the lack of decent paying jobs?Read More There are large portions of rural Iowa where there are minimum wage jobs without benefits. Wal-Mart has replaced many small businesses in rural counties. Many of their workers need welfare to survive. The welfare programs that Wal-Mart workers rely on include Medicaid, subsidized housing and food assistance. Meanwhile Wal-Mart and other corporations are setting records for corporate profits. A May 2013 report “The Low-Wage Drag on Our Economy: Wal-Mart’s Low Wages and Their Effect on Taxpayers and Economic Growth” shows how their business model exerts downward pressure on wages. Should we continue to support a created taxpayer-funded social welfare program by corporations? Raising the minimum wage could help alleviate those programs.
Maria Houser Conzemius June 13, 2013 at 11:14 am
Julia Ziesman, I boycott Walmart for the reasons you listed. American taxpayers subsidize Walmart'sRead More low wages and poor benefits with $2.1 billion a year. Collectively, Sam Walton's heirs contributed a whole $6,000 to charity. I looked up the three class-action lawsuits against Walmart that I knew about and found 71. Many lawsuits against Walmart are to try to make courts enforce their many rulings against Walmart. I was really upset when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to allow Walmart women workers' lawsuit against Walmart to proceed as a class-action lawsuit. The lawsuit that shocked me the most was that of a 33-year-old handicapped woman in a wheelchair who wouldn't believe that Walmart had shaved her time card hours in order to pay her less than the pitiful hourly wage she should have earned. Her lawyers had to produce documents to prove to her that Walmart was really that unethical.