patching...
Update: Are you on Facebook? Like Waukee Patch for quick news and comments throughout the day! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
B.A. English lit., College of Arts & Sciences, Cornell U., 1972. MSW, Univ. of Iowa, 1992.

'Mitt the Twit,' You Might As Well Quit: Kick Back, Have a Beer, and Kiss Your Presidential Campaign Goodbye (BLOG)

Stick a fork in it, Mitt. You're done. And what's more, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.

You wouldn't think that a Mother Jones reporter would get a boot-legged videotape of Mitt making an arse of himself at a $50,000-a-plate dinner for Floridian plutocrats, but somehow, he did.

Astute political analysts are already guessing how brutal the GOP's civil war will be after Romney's defeat. Will the moderates win out or will the hard-line Tea Partiers dig in for a fight? How many times will the GOP have to lose before they change their slant to the extreme right and come back closer to the center?

Right now, Mitt Romney is sticking to his drop-dead stance that 47% of Americans are moochers and fail to take personal responsibility for themselves. We know there's a grain of truth in that paranoia, but how much truth?

Are the elderly who have paid into Social Security and Medicare for decades moochers? Do they fail to take personal responsibility for themselves? How about disabled vets who can't find a job? How about the working poor who get Medicaid and food stamps? Why are they so poor? Maybe because they're not paid a living wage?

I talked to a young father once in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics when I was a social work intern there. 

"I'd like to be a paramedic," he said, "but I feel that if I studied to be a paramedic and made enough money to get off Medicaid, it would be irresponsible. My son needs health insurance."

His son's medical issues were not short-term. They were long-term. 

I couldn't argue with the father whose son absolutely had to have continuous good health insurance. His point was valid.

Was the young father failing to take personal responsibility, or was he doing what was best for his son, regardless of his personal ambition to be a paramedic?

We all know how risky it is to not have health insurance. I remember bringing my infant daughter to the emergency room at Mercy with pneumonia on Sept. 1st, the day my husband's health insurance kicked in after a three-month hiatus while he explored other careers. 

I know a 40-something year old man who lost a good job and found another job that's only part time at half the pay. He has to drive a long way to get there and back. If he applied for food stamps to help feed his family, would he be failing to take personal responsibility and care for himself?

How about my 50-something year old friend who lost her husband, her job, and her health insurance within a short space of time? She has a heart condition. What's she supposed to do if her young adult son wants to move back in with her because he can't find a job that pays a living wage? Say no? She's got a part-time job now that doesn't pay nearly as much as she made before. But she is taking personal responsibility for herself and helping her family at the same time. She gardens, she cans, her son hunts, and they eat.

All of these are real situations with real people. Mitt may despise this 47% that pays "no taxes," (don't forget sales tax, property tax, Social Security, Medicare, and so on) but those of us who have friends who are unemployed or under-employed through no fault of their own know that "those people" are doing the best they can.

James

2:48 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

I think Mr. Romney spoke what 53% of Americans really think. I don't think the number is as high as 47% of Americans are dependant on the Government, but it sure is alot higher since Obama came into office. And people quit looking for jobs because the found the benfits are better if you can find a way to become disabled. Maybe the problem is not as prevelant in Iowa, but in other larger state's the people are taking full advantage of this Socialist Presidents agenda.
If you were an Independant rather than a Democrat, this Blog would have more meaning.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evil Genius Villain

3:42 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Here! Here! James. I always thought the revolution would be started with the lower class rising up against the crushing oppression of the enlightened classes. I like your view though. Let's rise up against the socio-economically disabled and make a pre-emptive strike against the poor. Let's not for an instant think that they are entitled to anything that we, the working class, possess. "The Man" needs to keep them down.

Comment_arrow

Kol of Altai

8:06 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I am American -- born in the U.S. I have close family in Russia and I live in both countries, owning homes and businesses in both. Russian TV news anchors used to refer to GWB openly as a "simpleton," "stupid," "crude." Russian TV comedians use to make crude jokes about GWB and the whole nation looked at him as a fool., and laughed at him!! They've already started doing those things about Mitt The Twit Romney! And the fool's not elected, doesn't even stand a chance. But he's hilarious with his lies, his racism, his hate, is flip-flops, his fake religious HYPOCRISY!

Comment_arrow

Kol of Altai

8:07 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I am American -- born in the U.S. I have close family in Russia and I live in both countries, owning homes and businesses in both. Russian TV news anchors used to refer to GWB openly as a "simpleton," "stupid," "crude." Russian TV comedians use to make crude jokes about GWB and the whole nation looked at him as a fool., and laughed at him!! They've already started doing those things about Mitt The Twit Romney! And the fool's not elected, doesn't even stand a chance. But he's hilarious with his lies, his racism, his hate, is flip-flops, his fake religious HYPOCRISY!

Maria Houser Conzemius

3:17 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

James, the number of those dependent on government is higher under Obama because George W. Bush ran the economy off a cliff. He put two foreign wars on a credit card, gave tax cuts to millionaires & billionaires, and deregulated Wall Street more than Bill Clinton did.

Mitt Romney's solution to a bad economy is to give MORE tax cuts to billionaires and millionaires, give more money to the Defense Department, and deregulate Wall Street even more. Those strategies won't lower the national debt. They are likely to raise the national debt.

Pres. Obama failed us by failing to indict a single Wall Street banker who ripped us all off & laughed all the way to the bank. Obama protects Wall Street bankers from angry citizens with pitchforks. Main Street is getting screwed.

Mitt Romney wouldn't just protect Wall Street. He IS Wall Street. He buys companies, forces them to borrow excessive amounts of money, forces them into bankruptcy, fires their workers, & walks away with piles of money.

If elected, Romney would be the richest president ever elected & the only president to hide part of his money in Swiss bank accounts, in the Cayman Islands, and in a Bermuda shell company he invested in to avoid paying federal taxes here.

Why doesn't he release more than two years' worth of tax records? Because he probably didn't pay any taxes for 9-10 years & he doesn't want us to know it.

Obama's a disappointment. He could have done more but chose not to. Romney'd be a disaster.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:32 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

James you hit the nail right on the head. Why would people want to go out and work for money when Obama is pleading with them to stay home and get free money without working. Even stupid, lazy people can figure that one out...................And Maria sorry but you have been drinking the "koolaid".

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:16 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Maria you really do live in a fairytale, are there lots of pretty butterflys and ladybugs in your world?

Comment_arrow

M. Sokoll

9:55 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Maria: The disaster will be if Obama is re-elected. Your complete lack of financial knowledge is the paragraph starting "If elected". You've accepted the Dem lies without investigating.

Maria Houser Conzemius

3:28 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

BTW, sometimes I am an Independent if I get too mad at the Democrats. Right now I'm a Democrat because the stakes are so high.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James

7:06 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Im always an Independent, I go with who I feel will do the better job. I don't even change my registration because I feel it would be dishonest since Im not loyal to either party. Romney for President, Latham for Congress, Adams for State Senate and Taylor for State Rep. That's where Im at.

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:57 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Evil Genius Villain, hahaha! Your satirical comments remind me of one of Tom Frank's satirical passages in his book "What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America":

"... For decades Americans have experienced a populist uprising that only benefits the people it is supposed to be targeting.... The angry workers, mighty in their numbers, are marching irresistibly against the arrogant. They are shaking their fists at the sons of privilege. They are laughing at the dainty affectations of the...toffs. They are massing at the gates...hoisting the black flag, and while the millionaires tremble in their mansions, they are bellowing out their terrifying demands. 'We are here,' they scream, 'to cut your taxes.'"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evil Genius Villain

10:11 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Does this mean I don't get my revolution? I don't care who really starts it. I just want to get it over with and start rebuilding the country. I've laid out a great road map on rebuilding the country. It starts out like this......
"We the people of the United States of America........."

Jack F

9:17 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

I love how liberals have already called the election. Obama has done nothing he claimed he would and left America worse than he found it. When the Plebs realize they can vote themselves a handout... Democracy is lost or you get 4 more years of Obama.

Reply

CFBusinessOwner

9:53 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Mitt dug this hole all by his lonesome (no one helped him---he's a self-made hole digger!) and us "liberals" are just watching him dig more holes. No election called. We're still working hard so yes, we can have four more years of having Barack Obama as our president. He's not perfect---no one ever claimed he was, but when he picked up the shovel it was to clean up the mess the GOP left him and the country.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack F

10:31 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Ya libs have not called it but their owned Media have. Say it long enough and load enough in the Media it must be true. I love how the only advertisement here on the patch is Obama

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:32 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

+1, CFBusinessOwner! No, Pres. Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder are a long way from perfect, but a Romney/Ryan presidency would be a catastrophe for the middle class, the working poor, the elderly, the handicapped, and college students. We don't need a plutocrat who enjoys firing people or a repeat of the Mean Season.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Megan VerHelst

11:47 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Jack, maybe you should call up the Romney campaign and see if they'd like to PAY to advertise on Patch, too. ;)

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

11:55 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Megan VerHelst, +1! People don't seem to realize that money talks. As you said, if Romney paid to put campaign ads on the Patch, his ads would be there too.

This will be the most expensive presidential race in history. Newspapers don't make money without ads.

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:12 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

If he gets re-elected who in the hell will he blame the even bigger mess on after 4 MORE years....he obviously won't blame himself for eight years of total distruction to the country which by the way if he gets 4 more years it will be too late for anyone to fix anything.

Jack F

10:32 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Today we can wish them a Happy 20th Aniversery.

Reply

Joe Dygas

7:17 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

47 % of the population pay no income taxes! Shocking, this simply shows how bad the economy really is, 23 million plus are unemployed and have given up even looking for jobs. Just think, if Romney's economic plans were enacted, more of the 47% would be paying taxes and helping to bring the nation's debt and deficit down. As long as the maria and the democrats sing their siren song of victimology , the 47% will never pay any taxes, will never be employed, will be dependant on the government dole for the rest of their lives, will never be free to pursue life, liberty and happiness, will forever be the slaves of the democratic party , their slave masters.
Woe to the 47% who will never pay taxes and who will never find happiness tied to the government yoke which controls every facet of their lives.
Woe to Maria who is so misguided and drank the cool aid.
Maria and her ilk should see Part 2 of the movie Atlas Shrugged due out in theaters Oct. 3rd. It is a great story about the life and times we are living through but written in a book by Ayn Rand 50 years ago.
Remember Maria in November, Vote NObama, NOclintons, No dimorats!

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:41 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Joe I would love to shake your hand. And the poem below says it all. I'll be singing that one all through the season. Thanks.

Joe Dygas

7:23 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Twas Night before the Election
T'was the night before elections,
And all thru' the town,
Tempers were flaring
Emotions ran up and down.

I, in my bathrobe
With a cat in my lap,
Had shut off the TV,
tired of political crap.

When all of a sudden,
There arose such a noise,
I peered out my window,
Saw Obama and his boys

They had come for my wallet,
They wanted my pay
To hand out to others
Who had not worked a day!

He snatched up my money,
And quick as a wink,
Jumped back on his bandwagon
As I gagged from the stink.

He then rallied his henchmen
Who were pulling his cart.
I could tell they were out
To tear my country apart!

On Fannie, on Freddie,
On Biden and Ayers!
On Acorn, on Pelosi'
He screamed at the pairs!

They took off for his cause,
And as they flew out of sight,
I heard him laugh at a nation
Who wouldn't stand up and fight!
So I leave you to think
On this one final note...
IF YOU DON'T WANT SOCIALISM - - GET OUT AND VOTE !!!

Reply

Kurt B.

8:29 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

This blog looks like it will generate much enthusiasm. As an outsider ( ind.) looking in, here is my 2 cents worth :

- I think Romney did hurt himself in the latest round. But, on the other hand, he hit the nail on the head.

- What about the comments Obama made to the guy in Russia asking him to "let's wait" until after election time to proceed on whatever they were discussing?

- when you consider what a financial crisis this country is in, one must really wonder if Obama should even stay in office. This crisis will sink us if we don't start solving it NOW. Not 4 years from now when Obama will likely have us an extra 5 trillion in debt, but NOW ( that means TODAY, Sep 20, 2012 ).

- With Obama , we have more people unemployed than ever , more unemployment for a longer period of time than ever, more people on food stamps than ever, and on and on and on. ( like any boat taking on water, you have to have more people bailing water than watching. We have too many watching )

- be sure and ask your Congressman why, if the Affordable Health Care act is so good, why aren't THEY going to be on it ? And, while you are at it, ask for a summary of the new taxes that will be imposed as a result of this act. One of them that I wonder about .... WHY does anyone that sells their house have to pay a 3.8% excise tax to the government ? This is just one of many to come.

- Clint Eastwood said it best - we have to let him ( Obama ) go. It is our only hope of saving this country.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Leonard

9:12 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Kurt, your question to members of congress makes no sense. How can a congress member "be on" AHC? They will keep the insurance they have now, just as you will.

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

11:58 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

+1, David Leonard! Congress has a multiplicity of health insurance plans to pick from. I don't think Congress should have health insurance, whether they pay for it or not, until all of their constituents do. Right now 46 million Americans don't have health insurance. Even more have crappy health insurance. Many of those are the working poor.

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:34 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Re: Evil Genius Villain
10:11 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Does this mean I don't get my revolution? I don't care who really starts it. I just want to get it over with and start rebuilding the country. I've laid out a great road map on rebuilding the country. It starts out like this......
"We the people of the United States of America........."

Reply: Evil Genius Villain, hahaha! No, not at all! I was frustrated during the Arab Spring that we weren't having our own. How much worse do things have to get before we realize that our corporate-owned oligarchy is out of control & strangling our democracy?

According to Charles H. Ferguson in "Predator Nation," Obama coddles Wall Street & makes sure that the statute of limitations runs out on corporate crimes of "accounting fraud, honest services violations and bribery, perjury & making false statements to federal investigators, Sarbanes-Oxley violations (civil & criminal), RICO offenses & criminal antitrust violations, federal aid disclosure regulations, & personal conduct offenses (possession & use of drugs [including] cocaine), hiring of prostitutes, employment of prostitutes for business purposes, fraudulent billing of personal or illegal services as business expenses (sexual services, strip club patronage, & nightclub patronage) fraudulent use or misappropriation of corporate assets or services for personal use (e.g., use of corporate jets), personal tax evasion, & a variety of other offenses."

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

2:19 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Duh....thats because Charles H. Ferguson is right. Obama does exactly all of those things!

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:35 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Who do we choose to be our president??

Romney IS a tax evader, an out-of-touch plutocrat who has no clue how the rest of us live, and enjoys firing people.

Hmmmm...

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:46 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

If I were lucky enough to have the money that Romney does, I too would put it in off shore accounts so I could keep more of it and not have to give the goverment a big majority. He isn't a tax evader he is a smart business man. It is his money and he can put it wherever he wants to.

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

8:25 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

gee Maria do YOU work for the IRS? Is that how you know Romney is a tax evader or is that just what your democrat friends say?

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:36 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I'm going with Obama, but the revolution can't come soon enough for me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Leonard

9:14 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Maria, I love your original blog and all your subsequent comments, but I'm a little uncomfortable with your channeling my mind.

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

10:02 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

David Leonard, really? I hope that's a good thing! "Channeling my mind" sounds sinister . . . . :)

Joe Dygas

9:59 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Maria is clearly quite misinformed and appears to be a party activist. Her comments are misinformed, and misrepresentative of reality of the economic circumstances the nation finds itself in. Obama and his ilk in the democratic party are the problem not the solution. So, making all these idiotic little smart alek remarks about Romney are really missing the real story of Obama's failed administration, failed policies and intentions to doom America into a permanently low to no growth economy with 47% of the people on the dole and so on...Maria needs to get off the liberal cool aid and start drinking from the cup of reality. As long as o bama and his ilk are in office, America will not get out of the ditch.
Remember in November, Vote NObama, NOclintons, NOdemorats...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

10:14 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Joe Dygas, you should know that I've gone after single-party corruption in Johnson County, which is overwhelmingly Democratic. I'm an equal opportunity offender. One-party rule is intrinsically corrupt no matter which party is in charge.

Right now my main target is the politically correct, incompetent Democratic Johnson County Attorney, Janet Lyness, and her assistant county attorneys.

You know what happens when you ass-u-me.

maxine wiemer

10:04 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I am tired of people crying about the 47% who don't pay taxes. Well most of them should be. I admitt that there are some people who need assistance because they are ill or have ill children or single mothers who don't get support from thier childrens fathers, vets who cannot work etc. but when women keep having illigitamate kids just to get a bigger ckeck is wrong. And what about those people who sell thier food stamps to get money for alcohol and drugs? The system is broken and until they start drug testing everyone who applys for assistance it will never change.

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

10:19 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Joe, BTW, don't call me a party activist. I tried to serve on the Johnson County Democratic Central Committee and they wouldn't have me. You know how I got to appoint myself to the Johnson County Democratic Central Committee? I was the only Democrat/Independent to show up for the Jan. 23rd, 2010 caucus for Precincts 6 and 12. The only one!

You see how my conscientiousness was repaid, with insults and rudeness.

Republicans are sweet and polite in person. I even have good friends who are Republicans. It's Republican politics I can't stand.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Dygas

12:04 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I can help you with that problem. Think conservatively,e.g.;
- government needs to live within its means
- government needs to abide by the US Constitution and laws of the nation;
- Primary role of federal government is defense of the nation not providing everyone with happiness on their terms;
- The purpose of government is NOT to redistribute the wealth of the nation from one group to another because everyone is entitled under the consitution to pursue life, liberty and happiness on their own .
- This is the essence of it without getting into the weeds ...

David Leonard

11:42 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

When are some people going to get it through their heads that MANY of the 47% are hard-working Americans who simply don't make enough money to pay federal income tax. They aren't going to pay more than the IRS requires of them just as those who make tons of money aren't. Following the tax code does not a freeloader make.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

12:04 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

+1, David Leonard! The peasants with pitchforks are charging off in the wrong direction. They're their own worst enemy.

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

12:29 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

According to Democrats it does, you attack Romney on every turn for following the tax code then when we complain about the freeloaders, oh they are just following the tax code. Sorry but as usual you liberals want it both ways. Now we also know what Maria really thinks of the poor, they are peasants with pitch forks according to her, talk about an elitist attitude.

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

8:35 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Troy just nailed Maria...you are one of "those" who like to complain but shen it comes down to it, you want it both ways. Being on the fence can sometimes hurt.

Maria Houser Conzemius

12:02 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

maxine wiemer
2 hours ago
"If I were lucky enough to have the money that Romney does, I too would put it in off shore accounts so I could keep more of it and not have to give the goverment a big majority. He isn't a tax evader he is a smart business man. It is his money and he can put it wherever he wants to."

Reply: You're straight out of Tom Frank's satirical passages in his book "What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America":

"... For decades Americans have experienced a populist uprising that only benefits the people it is supposed to be targeting.... The angry workers, mighty in their numbers, are marching irresistibly against the arrogant. They are shaking their fists at the sons of privilege. They are laughing at the dainty affectations of the...toffs. They are massing at the gates...hoisting the black flag, and while the millionaires tremble in their mansions, they are bellowing out their terrifying demands. 'We are here,' they scream, 'to cut your taxes.'"

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

2:12 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I think instead of hitting the Koolaid you have been hitting the pipe....you Liberal democrats are all of the same mindset, you can't do anything without everyone doing it, you all say the same boring things over and over and over again. NOBAMA...NOSAMA...NOSAMAOBAMA

Comment_arrow

Joe Dygas

2:18 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Well, why didn't you make the right life decisions to make a lot of money. romney earned his, he did not inherit his money like the odious Kennedy family, or Kerry, or many other wealthy democrats like Pelosi and so on...It is your responsibility to pursue your own life and happiness, it is not the responsibility of the government to provide it for you. When the revolution comes, the population is likely to be reduced by 47%!!

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:40 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Gee Maria are you so rich that you don't ever have to worry about paying taxes? Oh thats right you people totally believe in "redistribution." Lets take from the poor and middle class people who actually WORK for a living and give it to the richer ones who can keep them in there mansions while the rest of us have to mow their grass, well its people like you that start the riots in the street with people like me who can see arrogant stupidity before it slaps me in the face.....redistibute that.

Kurt B.

12:09 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

@ David Leonard and Maria :

Just like everything else that Congress dows, if they want to experience what they have approved for the citizens they represent, they should be on the same plan as they are proposing to everyone else. Otherwise..... where is the incentive to correct any issues ?

Plus, I would be willing to bet you that the Congress people have a plan that is pretty darn good .... paid for by the taxpayers. Since it is so good, they certainly would not want to get on "the people's plan".

We are in for a real string of bad years, I think.

And, regarding those 47% that supposedly don't pay taxes - they actually do pay taxes, but not on their returns. What they are doing is 100% legal and proper as our tax system is broken. The taxes they pay are things such as propoerty tax, sales tax, etc etc. What they don't pay ( or, better said is what they get back ) is the IRS taxes, because whatever they paid gets refunded, based on their AGI, tax tables, etc. Still, it points out that the system needs fixing, and it has been this way for quite a while. Just not this bad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

David Leonard

2:52 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Kurt, there IS no one plan Congress is proposing for everyone else. If there were, I suppose it would have to be a single payer plan. One plan=single payer, get it? Once the AHC plan is fully implemented, we will still have plenty of options. I'll keep what I have now, and I imagine you will as well.

I believe people in congress have a variety of options to choose from--probably all very good. I also think they pay something for their health insurance--at least for the family portion--though they undoubtedly get a great deal.

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

12:38 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

If you believe that Jim Jones has some koolaid for you to. What happens when they make the rules so odious no one wants to offer health insurance because there is no money to be made or in other words when they make it so it is cheaper for the employer to quit offering health insurance and just pay the fine? That's right folks you get a single payer plan called government care. The unaffordable care act is just the slippery slope to socialized medicine. Hmm I wonder why there is a tax on the sale of my home in the UCA?

maxine wiemer

2:38 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Romney did indead earn his money..people who say he didn't and say he is a tax evader are just jealous.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

2:57 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

So maxine, are you saying that Mitt Romney DOESN'T evade paying his taxes by hiding money in Swiss bank accounts, Cayman Islands bank accounts, and in a shell company in Bermuda? Because if you're saying that, you are misinformed, perhaps willfully so.

Why doesn't Mitt Romney release as many tax returns as his father did when he was running for public office? Could it be that Mitt isn't as honest or as forthcoming as his father?

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

12:43 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

She may not be saying it Maria but I am. I bet you even have money in those places in the form of a retirement account that owns stock in places like that or hedges money there.

Personally I wouldn't release my tax returns either. You are all so jealous that he is successful and that you can't get your hands on his money that you attack him for following the tax code the democrats had two years to change. Did you forget you controlled both houses and the presidency and yet the capital gains tax stayed the same as well as the bush tax cuts and not a budget in sight for years.

maxine wiemer

6:10 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Maybe its because he has released what is required of him and the rest is his own business. Is it against the law to have accounts in those places and live in the US? No I didn't think so. Whats the big deal he has shown the world what he must and that is all he has to do.

Reply

Joe Dygas

6:30 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

I believe as long as obama refuses to release his school records at Harvard and his publications and themes at Harvard then Romney should even release a single fart!
Worse yet, the libs on this blog are not aware that obama was raised as a kid of privelege both overseas in Indonesia, in Hawaii and after claiming he was a foreign student was given free tuition and expenses at Harvard....
Kudos to Maxine for standing up Maria and her liberal rants...amen

Reply

David Leonard

8:42 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Has any president ever released his college records and his college writing? If so, I'd like their names and where I can find what they released.

Reply

maxine wiemer

9:09 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

It may not be a requirement to release your collage records but it sure might give us alittle insight into the real meaning behind this attempted democratic takeover. Obama is just the puppet people, I believe their is a much bigger force working on all the people of our great country and "He" is just the messenger............Obama is a muslim, need I say more?

Reply

CFBusinessOwner

9:36 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Muslim? Really Maxine? I have to believe by the tone of your writing that you are being sarcastic or a troll because it's all too off kilter to be anything but "baiting" satire.

Waiting for the "democratic" takeover----is that like the Rapture?
Laughing or else I'd cry at the insanity of some of these posts...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

12:48 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

You claim to be a business owner. My guess is the only business you own depends on government contracts or you suffer from the same syndrome of buffet whereas you have made so much money and given so little to charity that you feel guilty for your success and think government should take more to make things " fair" . I really cannot understand how someone who claims to be in business owner could even remotely support the idiot currently residing in the white house. He has to be the unfriendliest president to business since the idiot peanut farmer.

Comment_arrow

Joe Dygas

8:13 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Correction: the rapture has already occurred, it was the 2008 election of the first communist as president of the USA.

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:22 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

+1, CFBusinessOwner! One of my favorite bumper stickers is, "Last time we mixed politics with religion, some people got burned at the stake."

Can a recapitulation of the Salem witch trials be far behind?

Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:24 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Troy Murphy,

Obama "has to be the unfriendliest president to business since the idiot peanut farmer"?? That's funny, because what I don't like about Pres. Obama is that he's been TOO friendly to business, i.e., Wall Street bankers. I think you make stuff up as you go along. Your comments are fact-free and completely mythical.

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

8:53 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Really CFBO? Maybe you should cry at the state of affairs our nation is in instead of my posts....

Robert Latta

6:46 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

It is amazing to me that many Democrats while criticizing Romney for his comments about the lazy 47% still unwittingly buy into many of the false premises of that depiction of our economy.

The most obvious example is someone who has worked ALL of their lives and PAID income tax AND paid into Social Security and Medicare. When they retire and start to get Social Security checks and health care via Medicare then they suddenly become part of the lazy, irresponsible 47%! Really Mitt? Is that who the GOP considers irresponsible and dependent on government?

On the other side of the ledger we do all benefit when entrepreneurs risk capital and work hard to create successful businesses. In my opinion we do not do enough to make it easier for individuals to start businesses because established businesses lobby government to put up barriers that limit competition. And established businesses are very effective in offloading their costs onto taxpayers in ways that we take for granted; the costs of pollution, infrastructure, training, law enforcement and much, much more when corporations make governments compete against each other to site their facilities. Taxpayers built that and companies and wealthy owners benefit and they use their market leverage to limit competition.

Yes, those who build businesses should be well rewarded but that does not mean they should be able to pull up the ladders of opportunity behind them and not pay for the costs of doing business.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Dygas

8:11 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Let me see if I understand your point. businesses who do not pay for their cost of doing business might include: the ethanol industry, the wind energy industry, the solar power industry, farmers who get free money for CRP land, and other subsidized businesses. Is this what you meant? I agree that the federal gov should stop the subsidizing of business. if a business is truly commercial then it should not need money from the gov. Right?

Comment_arrow

Robert Latta

8:59 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

EVERY business is subsidized to some extent, no business could survive without transportation infrastructure, law enforcement, education of the workforce, digital infrastructure etc. BTW the lowest fifth of the population by income has received a lower percentage of government assistance in the last 20 years and the richest fifth has increased it's share of assistance (mostly Social Security and Medicare) while it pays less in taxes. Meanwhile workers have increased their productivity while their wages have gone down after adjustment for inflation. In other words you could make the case that the rich are the takers and the working poor are the makers.

But that is just as divisive and deceptive. What is true is that almost everybody works hard for what they get AND they benefit from government programs and it is divisive and deceptive to pit false categories of "makers" against another false category of "takers".

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

9:53 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Troy is right Maria Obama is the most unfriendliest president except when he is sucking up to get votes. He is rude, arrogant and and thinks he know everything and also believes he dosen't have to follow the same rules the rest of us do. In fact he likes to think he can make up the rules to suit his needs.

Kurt B.

8:14 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

@ Joe Dygas - actually, the Kennedy family got their fortune by dealing in illegal liquor. The fortune they amassed has been passed down from generation to generation. To paraphrase one economic professor : to make a lot of money in life, start with a lot of money and make it grow. Our debt is actually this in reverse - a huge debt and getting bigger. It is close to the point of being irreversible ( too big to pay off, unless you extend it out 500+ years. ) What is the interest on 16 trillion dollars, at the low low rate of 5% per year. Astounding !!! Now, try to figure out a way to pay this off. What are the options ? This is the challenge facing America.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Dygas

4:03 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Step 1. Stop adding to the national debt, and reduce all those entitlement expenses to help do that ...
Step 2. Ob ama care has to go the way of the dodo bird because it will only add more to the debt.
Step 3. Toss out the income tax code and replace it with a simple flat tax applicable to everyone regardless of level or source of income. That way the 47% gets to pay along with all the rich guys.
Step 4. Stop giving foreign aid to islamic nations who clearly are not our allies.
Step 5. Replace foot soldiers with strategic warfare via airpower and missile power along with the drones...
Step 6. Sell off some of the federal land ownership into the private sector.
Step 7. Change a lot of federal regulations and laws like the national environmental policy act, dissolve the EPA and place environmental protection in the federal agencies.
Step 8 . Reorganize the federal agencies and their missions ...
Step 9. Sell off unused federal buildings and facilities...
Step 10. Never, ever elect another democrat at the federal, state or local level.
and this is just a start...

maxine wiemer

8:28 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

I was absolutely NOT being sarcastic, this world is nothing to joke about. You on the other hand are only barking up the wrong tree and need to get a clue.
If all the "so called" business owners had your mind set we'e all be in trouble.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

12:01 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Joe, I enjoyed your steps 1 through 10 with number 10 being my favorite. That would deffinetly be half the battle right off the top! Well said.

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:28 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Kurt B., another challenge we face is your desire to catapult the stagnant recovery into another Great Depression by drastically cutting back on spending at a time when we need to infuse the economy with money given to people who are likely to spend it the quickest: the struggling middle class, retirees on a fixed income, the unemployed collecting unemployment insurance, and the handicapped. Those folks can't afford to hoard money and collapse the economy by refusing to spend it -- that's what the rich are doing.

Our economy is 70% consumer driven.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt B.

4:05 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Good comments. However, another way of looking at this : this country is hugely in debt. And, usually ( 99.9 % of the time ) the lenders want to get repaid. We are spending money quicker than it is coming in. I don't suggest to stop the beneficial spending, but things like Pelosi taking 2 plane loads of people to Denmark a couple of years back to see the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony - now, come on now !! And, there are many examples like this ( such as flying the presidents dog on a private plane to join them at their vacation spot ). I doubt campaign funds were used to pay that bill !! And, Michelles vacations ? Need I say more ?

I often wonder what China will do when they ask for a payment of their loans to us and we can't pay. What do you suggest ? - maybe give them Hawaii ? Alaska ? They are going to want something. BTW, did you calculate the interest on $16 trillion, at a meager 5% per year rate ?

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:41 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

Troy Murphy
12:29 am on Friday, September 21, 2012
"According to Democrats it does, you attack Romney on every turn for following the tax code then when we complain about the freeloaders, oh they are just following the tax code. Sorry but as usual you liberals want it both ways. Now we also know what Maria really thinks of the poor, they are peasants with pitch forks according to her, talk about an elitist attitude."

Reply: Troy Murphy, I grew up very poor. We often didn't have milk or meat in our house. I had to be nice to the son of our grocer, because his dad let us charge groceries and brought us venison once in a while. I worked at a local army base on a Youth Opportunity Grant. When I was 17 years old, I won a full-ride academic scholarship to the College of Arts and Sciences at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY because I scored in the 700s on my SATs and had good grades. I am sorry that such opportunities are no longer as available to poor but intelligent students.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

10:03 am on Friday, September 21, 2012

You may have been one of the lucky ones who got to go to collage and many of us grew up poor, dosen't make you special, however Obama is NOT the be all answer you like to think he is.

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

5:35 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Your point? I grew up poor middle class, didn't know it at the time, lived on an acreage raised a cow hog rabbits and chickens with a two acre garden butchered them every year. Picked up corn missed by the combines to feed the livestock we butchered, parents both worked, worked my way through college. My brother and I took over a business my father started when he was laid off at 50 and no one would hire him because he made to much. We have grown it by 10 fold. The opportunities are there. Nobody paid our way through college, we borrowed it and yes it was government guaranteed. I don't have a problem with government giving help but it should be only help not a freebie. I paid all the money back in 10 years between my wife and I that was over 80000.00 20 years ago. Why should poor but intelligent students get a free ride when I borrowed and worked my way through college. That is the problem with you liberals, you want to give it away not make people earn it. Something gotten for free has that exact value, ZERO

Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

2:08 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Maria, did you grow up just plain poor, or "poor middle class"? I'm thinking the former, but thanks to Troy, I see how he suffered, too, while being a step above your situation, perhaps? Really, "poor middle class"! I do not understand how his story of rising above his situation, to where he is now, can help. Unless he forgets where he came from, the "poor middle class" section of our economy, when now-today- "poor" is equated with "middle class", maybe? So sad, and those below that level, heaven help them. It is all about taxes, and the economy, (stupid), and how those at the top, however they came to rest there, so totally forgot.

Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

2:37 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Troy, your comment just burst my middle-class bubble. I thought I grew up middle class, which I did, but since when has the "poor" word been attached to "middle class", at least back when you were growing up? Not then, while you were butchering all those animals you raised. I'm an iowan farm girl, btw, so I know how hard that was for you, or maybe not-just part of being raised on a farm. Seems now the middle class is truly poor, as we've heard, and if we should believe what we've heard at all.. I don't see now why either candidate can really help, and certainly not one who could ever suffer the trauma you did, in butchering the cow hog rabbits and chickens. Just saying...

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

10:39 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Charlotte,

I think you miss my point. The point is in this country where you start out in life is rarely where you end up. You truly can be anything you want here. ONLY if you are willing to work for it. Liberals act as if being poor in this country is a permanent condition like it is in some other countries. Here in the USA being poor is as transient as you want it to be. The barriers to success in the USA are usually those you put in front of yourself or based on decisions you made. Contrary to liberal belief there is no "man" holding you down.

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

10:51 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Charlotte,
Butchering those animals for me was just another somewhat dirty chore you did. Can't say at the time we gave it much thought, as far as attaching labels of poor or middle class, at the time I would have said we were middle class. I don't remember being unhappy or not having what I needed and we always had fun birthdays and Christmas. Probably because both my parents worked and we worked to provide as well with the garden and livestock. The point is we all contributed to the family and therefore we all had what was needed with some extra. People make it sound that poverty is horrible, but if you look at the statistics in the US the "poor" here have cars, tv, cable, cell phone, DVD player, computer and most of the things the middle class has. The US has very little of the grinding poverty you see in other countries and where we do assistance is available.

Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

1:08 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Troy, I totally did not miss your point, and if you cannot see that, well, I fear you forget where you came from, especially in saying, "Here in the USA being poor is as transient as you want it to be." Ok, I don't like all those dolts on the endless rolls taking our tax $$, but it seems we will always have those dolts, for whatever reasons. You rose above, and superseded any potential dolt rolls, in case you had not succeeded so well. Great for you, but, you are on the side now, where entitlements have an entirely different meaning, for those always securely feeling their entitlements were ok, while never having suffered any form of poverty, or that dreaded, poor middle class label, in trying to rise above. You so totally rose above where you were, it seems, but, it seems some concessions are in order ahead for those not so lucky as you. If you want to get rid of all entitlements, since Mitt hates them, that 47%, especially, what?

Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

1:25 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Troy, my dad once told me and by sibs that he was born in a chicken coop, since his family was so poor, and that his bed, for awhile after his birth, was a dresser drawer. Your comments of your sufferings just reminds me of my dad's supposed birth, in a chicken coop? Really, how was I and my sibs ever supposed to believe that too sad beginning?! Well, I think their was a grain of truth (like corn, or soybeans, perhaps?) in his exaggerations, but I was most impressed with how he made us all laugh, in ever telling this story, of how he supposedly was born. Still makes us sibs laugh, even if he now may need a little of those entitlements, if he now falls in that 47% category, in his old age. He hates ever being considered a part of this 47% now, who pay no income taxes, while he paid such gladly in his long working life.

Maria Houser Conzemius

2:52 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

maxine wiemer, I never said I was special. I am educated, however. I am grateful that I was fortunate enough to have received an outstanding education. People can educate themselves, however, if they're predisposed to take the time and effort.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt B.

4:11 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Your credentials look good and you are certainly to be congratulated on your accomplishments. But, getting anything like what you have " by ones self" is impossible to do. The colleges and universities don't hand out degrees to people that don't attend, but have educated themselves.

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

5:39 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

I too am educated, maybe I don't have the degrees to prove it but I graduated from the school of hard knocks and I happened to believe learning about life the hard way is sometimes a better way to go. At least it teaches you to not have your nose in the air all the time.

Joe Dygas

4:18 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Well, it appears that in the world of business and folks who invent things, that most of the successful ones never went to college, so, college and university degrees are not always the path to great wealth or success in that sense. The origins of Apple and Microsoft got started ina garage...even zuckerbergs invention of facebook did not require college knowledge but only computer knowledge...starting a business does not require college but having a marketable idea ... not as easy as that sounds...and so on...look at obama with a harvard degree and he has turned America into a fiscal swamp overnight with his socialist anti colonial nonsensical ideology... where are the guys with the pitchforks anyway...let's have the revolution Maria keeps yakking about...ha ha ... Keep em honest Kurt...it is like batting flies with a swatter...ha ha

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:39 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Joe Dygas, some naive folks like myself think that getting a good education is a good thing in and of itself. I'm not rich because I got an Ivy League education.

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:29 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Kurt B., I actually think learning is a lifelong process. I continue to educate myself all the time. I'm reading "No Easy Day" by the Navy Seal (pseudonym = Mark Owen) who helped put Osama bin Laden away in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and I'm rereading Tom Frank's "What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America."

I also like to read books about genetics, the history of the English language, and books about the economy and politics. Fiction is nice for a change sometimes too.

I don't plan to stop educating myself. It's a journey, it's interesting, and it's fun. If I quit learning after two degrees I wouldn't know very much.

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:36 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Joe Dygas, on the contrary. I think Pres. Obama has made a good start on colonializing Afghanistan, and I'm not sure we shouldn't, assuming that we can afford it.

Also, for a socialist, Obama has amassed surprisingly massive campaign donations from Wall Street. If he were a socialist, I don't think Wall Street, including Bain Capital, would have given Obama a dime. All of his coddling of Wall Street and refusal to indict, much less prosecute, corporate criminals on Wall Street has really paid off! Some "socialist"!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

5:39 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Boy are you Naive, business pay politicians they don't agree with to hedge their bets and to buy influence. Duh!

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

5:44 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

well he damn sure isn't a capitalist, he is actually a communist/socialist

Comment_arrow

maxine wiemer

5:56 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012

Man Maria for someone so well educated I would think you could figure that out! LOL

Charlotte G.

1:42 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Ok, so if Mitt is right, 47% of we Americans of working age do not pay income taxes. I just wonder how many stay-at-home-moms are included in his figure? None? Including Mitt's wife perhaps?- who I can't help but admire. But, still...If I was his wife when he made that comment, if I was there, I would've just cringed, while wanting to smack him. Moms who have ever stayed at home for whatever reasons, we see how our working at all, will never figure into that 47%.

Reply

Kurt B.

5:05 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

@ Maria : your blog has generated some excellent feedback. Between Joe Dygas, Troy Murphy, Maxine and Charlotte, we have enough good ideas generated here to get a good start on turning this country around. Joe's 10-steps are priceless !! Excellent.

And to Charlotte : I don't know how they figure the "47%" figure, but it is probably from the tax records submitted to IRS. Therefore, a housewife ( or a househusband, like I was once ) would not be in this category as they would not be submitting a return unless that person were the head of a household and submitted a return. I do think a flat tax is a good idea worth considering.It just makes sense .... everyone is benefitting from the security our armed forces are providing ..... let's all chip in. The only issue I see is - the legislature people are the ones that need to make the decision. If whatever they are proposing doesn't benefit them, they won't act on it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

6:43 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Well I am a stay at home wife with a homebased business and I file taxes every year. My husband works outside the home and we file jointly. I beleive I would fall into that catagory right Kurt?

Joe Dygas

7:49 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

It appears that us few bloggers are in some form of consensus on the way forward. Maria your mission impossible as the official english major grad of the group is to prepare a letter to Iowa's congressional delegation reflecting all the good ideas we have promoted here. Kudos to everyone for their passionate ideas practical or not.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

10:40 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Joe Dygas, I kind of like the idea of being the official English major of the group. It gives me a faux sense of belonging.

Jack F

9:24 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Here is an easy one.... Flat tax.... Everyone pays, NO special interest deductions... Rich end up paying more than the poor... No one pays anything for the first $30,000 earned... Wouldn't need to wast so much money on employee IRS agents... Gov tax income would go up and spending on all the IRS would go down.... Eliminate the Earned Income Credit where people cheat and get a "TAX REFUND" that is more than the actual income tax they paid in... Pathetic

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

6:18 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

I believe a flat tax is the only fair way to go. One tax for everything and everyone. Do away with income tax and capitol gains tax and make everything else a set number and that way everyone would always be able to figure it out because no matter what you spend your money on the tax would be a certain amount. Same for the rich, poor, and everyone in the middle.

Maria Houser Conzemius

10:36 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Can I get a rough age range of this remarkably enthusiastic group of Tea Partiers?

I'll start, though I'm not a Tea Partier, obviously. I'm 63 years old.

Reply

Joe Dygas

11:08 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

I have Maria beat age wise...I like the flat tax idea...further discussion and some facts are needed...but the real issue at the moment of course is preventing the apple cart from going over the cliff, and reducing spending in an intelligent way not by sequestration which is equivalent to fiscal castration to coin a phrase, ;-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Maria Houser Conzemius

12:11 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Joe Dygas, thanks for responding, sir. I think that yes, further discussion and some facts are needed. One of those facts is that Congress dug its own sequestration hole by refusing to act. Sequestration could have been avoided. Not sure it will be.

Should we keep paying Congress to not do its job and enjoy frequent vacations for doing absolutely nothing? How about that farm bill? What's the hold-up there?

Maria Houser Conzemius

11:25 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Charlotte G., you're on to something. Our disappearing middle class is getting poorer all the time. Our real wages (what our money is actually worth/can purchase) have been declining since Bill Clinton left office. Between 2002 and 2006, the average inflation adjusted income of the top 1% of earners increased by 42%, whereas the bottom 90% only saw an increase of 4.7%.

As my bumper sticker says,

"At least the war on the middle class is going well."

According to the British historian and journalist Godfrey Hodgson, "On the basis of such evidence I myself have written that 'by all statistical measures . . . the United States, in terms of income and wealth, is the most unequal country in the world. While the average income in the United States is still almost the highest in the world . . . the gap between wealth and poverty is higher than anywhere else, and is growing steadily greater.'"

-- "The middle-class squeeze," Wikipedia

Charles H. Ferguson ("The Inside Job" and "Predator Nation") said that the United States has a more rigid class structure than Europe.

Can't you feel it? Isn't that why the right-wing shock troops resent the educated so much? Be assured that some of your suspicions are correct. Guys like the sexist former president of Harvard University, Larry Summers, and others like him have made it clear that they are for sale. Academia is corrupted like the rest of our society.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

2:54 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Maria, the ironic point of your post is that the middle class increased their wealth 4.7 % faster than inflation. That means they had a net increase in their standard of living. The wealthier might have gotten wealthier at a faster rate but the middle class also had a better standard of living by your own statistics. For some reason liberals really have a problem with wealth disparity. Why are you liberals entitled to take from me to line your own pocket. This country was founded on rugged individualism not a socialist mentality. 100 yers ago we didn't have any social welfare systems and basically no income tax. Why all of a sudden are you entitled to what I earned, you already tax me at a higher rate than everyone else and when I want everyone to pay the same percentage you act as if I am not paying my fair share. I pay more than what is fair.

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

6:04 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Just FYI...I don't resent the educated, I admire them very much, my children are collage educated. But I do resent the ones who think they are better than those who are less formally educated. Compassion comes from within and sometimes being street wise means being able to read people and see things from a whole other perspective.

James

11:51 am on Saturday, September 22, 2012

O wow, I have missed lots of good conversation here. Lots of mud slinging. But it's been fun to read. Troy Murphy, your logic is on point.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack F

1:20 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

I am tired about hearing about the subjective "middle class". Middle class is a waypoint in life not a destination. At the end of our career we have either climbed out of the middle class or adjusted our lives to live on a very low income. Some even choose to continue to work. This lie that at a certain age we should all be able to stop work and move to FL and live the high life is nuts.

Comment_arrow

Jack F

1:32 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

If I have a job working 40 hours a week and earning 30K a year am I poor or middle class? Why would I not go to Mc Dees and get another job working 20 hours a week? At the rate they pay that's another 10K a year. I have the time. I know a lot of "rich" that are "rich because they don't limit their earnings to 40 hours a week. If I sleep 8 hours that means I have 168 hours in a week with 56 of them sleeping and only 40 working. I could work another 40 hour job, double my poor middle class income, and still have another 30 hours a week to spend my extra money. Of course I would get jacked by the tax rate because I would earn more and take home less. Now I remember why Americans don't work more but want the "rich" to redistribute their hard earned money.

Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

2:04 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Jack, I am tired of hearing about the middle classes' woes, too, but why should you subject/object to any subjective "middle class." as you say? However you define it? Do you want to get rid of that class here? You say middle class is a "waypoint in life not a destination." Wow! It seems many in the middle class are sitting quite happily there, as always, while certainly never thinking they were living "on a very low income.", as you say. Oh, I see so clearly, whatever concerns the middle class has now, in their newest definition, should all realize their class is about to be eliminated if Mitt is elected. You make no mention of the lowest caste, oh, I mean, class-the poorest of the poor? They will be left over afterwards as always in being poorest, if Mitt wins, but it will be a very hard leap for any of them to climb out of their class, to the next, since there is no middle class in-between. Thank you, and goodnight, dear Jack....

maxine weimer

3:38 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

I think as much as I don't want to admit it, there are those people within the 47% range who do choose not to work because they feel entitled to receive all the freebies as they possibly can. Be it food stamps, money or any other kind of handout. That is why the welfare system is in dyre need of a major overhaul. Those women who continue to have children well into their forty's just so the checks they receive will keep getting bigger is just plain wrong. And what about the people who sell their food stamps or trade them for drugs? Mandatory drug testing for every single person who applys for assistance should be a law. I beleive there are those who qualify and those who need to prove it.

Reply

maxine weimer

3:56 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Just for general info, alittle about myself so some people won't think I am just some random loon. I am 58 yrs. young, still married to my high school sweetheart after 40 years, have 4 beautiful grown children, and 8 even more beautiful grand children. I lead aquiet life, have my own homebased business and am very passionate about what I care most about and one of those things is doing all I can to make sure my grandkids will have the freedom to persue the things in life they may choose to. Life, Liberty and the persuit of Happiness...that's what they deserve, thats what we all deserve. Obama's gotta go.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt B.

7:47 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

I second the motion from Maxine. My friend up in Waterloo has re-defined the OMG text abbreviation. It now means Obama Must Go !!

Troy Murphy

7:10 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Hi Maxine congratulations on staying married so long. I also have 4 beautiful daughters 5, 9, 12, and 14. Married 21 years and I am 46. I argue politics for 4 reasons and they are listed above. I hold the fundamental belief that you can't tax and spend your way to prosperity and that taxing one man at a higher rate than another is fundamentally thievery at best and immoral at its worst. On social issues I really am ambivalent as long as I don't pay for the consequences of your actions

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

9:22 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

It is so true Troy. While I am a few years older than you, sometimes I wish I could take my kids and grandkids back to the peaceful, safe fun loving times that I enjoyed growing up in Ohio. Life seemed a whole lot simplier then. Life in the 60's was grand. Anyway I have a question for you. It seems to me that whenever I talk or actually listen to any liberals or democrats they just cannot see things from our perspective. And it dosen't even make any sense to me the things they beleive it would take to improve this country. I always feel so confused because they all believe the total opposite of what the repulicans believe. How did they get like that? Why is it that most of them seem to love being in debt.

Comment_arrow

Troy Murphy

11:34 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Personally I think most liberals harbor an inordinate amount of guilt at their lack of charity and try to alleviate it by spending other people's money or alternatively it may be an I'm smarter than you attitude in which they think they can fix every problem if us evil republicans would just let them spend our money, but my wife tells me to be more charitable and therefore I am going with the theory that they truly believe that only the needy actually use government programs and if a million people apply for the money there must be a million truly needy people. I on the other hand am more realistic and believe that poverty should be uncomfortable, almost painful, of course to a liberal that makes me mean and hateful. I just think government help should be the help of last resort and not the first place you turn. My father taught me how to work and that there was no shame in any job as long as you worked hard. Sadly most liberals I have met think they are entitled to a certain wage not because the job warrants it but because they are worth it. The problem with that attitude is that some jobs everyone can do and will never pay well.

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

9:20 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012

It's true. I believe everyone should be taxed at the same rate. It isn't the poor man's fault that he isn't rich and it isn't the rich man's fault he isn't poor. Just tax every person at the same rate and it will all work out for the best. NO ONE should be exempt from contributing, if someone is on welfare then they should be taxed the same as if they got a paycheck. And if they test positive for drugs then they shouldn't get anything at all.

Kurt B.

7:43 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

@ Maxine : As I see it - yes. The IRS would have you down as a taxpayer since your return is a joint one. And, I do agree 100% with you .... a flat tax is much fairer than what we have now. I see that the geniuses in France have decided to tax those that make over 1 million Euro ( about 1.25 million $ ) a hefty 75% rate "until the crisis is over". The only thing is ..... the crisis is never over so once they get the revenues coming in from the wealthy at the 75% rate, something else develops that requires them to raise it to 80% and so on. We can't let this happen here.

And I , like others blogging here, have 4 reasons also that makes me super-concerned. 4 kids ; 3 girls and one boy. As I had stated in other blogs, I am a naturalized citizen but went to h.s. in USA , graduated from college in USA , served in the US Army, and have traveled all over the world. I can tell you one thing : from what I have seen in the USA, we have very very little poverty compared to such countries as South Africa, Brazil and Mexico. There is no place in the world like the USA and it is worth all of our efforts to make sure we do not get shoved over the financial cliff that is upon us.

One other thing : Maria can sure generate some feedback from the local communities !! Congrats Maria on your blog !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack F

7:49 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Man this is begging to sound like an AA meeting. BTW Kurt... Thanks for your service.

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

1:17 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Kurt you are right, we cannot let that happen here. Except that is EXACTLY what Obama wants to turn us into. If he does get re-elected there will be that revolution Maria is waiting for only I don't think she will think it's so cool after the republicans get through literally and physically taking it back.

maxine weimer

8:04 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

Charlotte, as I grew up I always heard things like "poor" middle class, "the middle" class and "upper" middle class. So I assumed it was some sort of tier used only for measureing where you actually fit into the middle class.

Reply

maxine weimer

9:34 pm on Saturday, September 22, 2012

As much as I am enjoying this forum, I'm sorry but everytime I log on I have to see "Mitt the Twit" and it is really pissing me off. I would rather see something like "Obama the one term President!"

Reply

maxine weimer

10:06 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Charlotte, I think maybe you had a few too many nips at the koolaid last night if you really believe what you just posted.

Reply

maxine weimer

10:53 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Charlotte....being in the middle class is certainly a waypoint in life and not a destination. Think about it, do you tell your children to strive only to make it to the middle class or do you tell them to go far and become all they can be? Who would settle for being in the middle class if they could make into the "rich" catagory? What you said makes no sense and why do you think Romney wants to do away with the middle class? Are you saying there should only be 2 classes of people...the rich and the poor and no one in the middle? That is absurd.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jack F

11:16 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Thanks Maxine ... You clarified what I meant. Unlike that Jeff Klintzman you don't get distracted by my poor usage but try to understand the meaning. Thank you.

Comment_arrow

Jack F

11:21 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

As far as the poor, my point is simple, you can't be poor if you don't sit around the house watching Oprah and waiting for your government check. I see jobs posted everywhere, ya they don't pay great but if you work 60 hours a week instead of taking the weekends off you can rise out of the ashes. It worked for me. I don't remember a time when I didn't have at least two jobs. One a steady job and at least one or two part time jobs to pay for savings or some extras the kids needed or I wanted to give them.

David Leonard

11:04 am on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Last man/woman to post wins? I think you all have set a new comments record on Patch.

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

12:42 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

maxine, please stop with the personal attacks and insults. You're not contributing anything positive or fact-based to these comments.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

2:01 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Maria sorry but if you don't like my comments just simply skip over them. Just because you think I have nothing to offer dosen't make it so.

Maria Houser Conzemius

12:47 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

To Charlotte G.'s comment: "Jack, I am tired of hearing about the middle classes' woes, too, but why should you subject/object to any subjective "middle class." as you say? However you define it? Do you want to get rid of that class here? You say middle class is a "waypoint in life not a destination." Wow! It seems many in the middle class are sitting quite happily there, as always, while certainly never thinking they were living "on a very low income.", as you say. Oh, I see so clearly, whatever concerns the middle class has now, in their newest definition, should all realize their class is about to be eliminated if Mitt is elected. You make no mention of the lowest caste, oh, I mean, class-the poorest of the poor? They will be left over afterwards as always in being poorest, if Mitt wins, but it will be a very hard leap for any of them to climb out of their class, to the next, since there is no middle class in-between. Thank you, and goodnight, dear Jack...."

Reply: Yes, I was struck with the "middle class as waypoint" comment too. It looks like at least one of the posters here is Mitt's target audience: the rich. You're right about Mitt Romney consigning the working poor, the elderly, the handicapped, veterans looking for work, and the middle class to oblivion. That's an awful lot of us.

Mitt doesn't seem to realize that 61% of those who pay no federal income taxes, though they do pay payroll, property, and sales tax, are the working poor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

1:34 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

So Maria you just included yourself in the middle class and yet a few comments ago you said you "aren't rich because you have an ivy league education" .......so I am just wondering where you place yourself, in the middle class or in the "rich" catagory? It does make a difference on your perspective of the rest of us.

Joe Dygas

2:33 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

The simple reason Maria is not wealthy as she has said, is because english majors are not in demand for any particular reason. Now if she had written a famous novel and published it, Like Ayn Rand published the Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged then she would be both famous and wealthy. Had she been an engineer she might have made it into the upper middle class, had she majored in Business she would be in bankruptcy thanks to obama, had she majored in science she might have become famous but would still be living in poverty or she might have majored in religeon and perhaps she could have saved the souls of the world of islam .... but alas it is too late for any of that now. But to be jealous or envious of the success of others is merely pathetic.

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

5:09 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

I'm not rich and never have been. I would like the negative comments to stop. Maxine, I never said I'm "not rich because I have an Ivy League education." That would be a ridiculous thing to say. My sister Kristin has an Ivy League education (Yale) and she IS rich. She's an attorney. I am not rich. Having an Ivy League education is no guarantee of wealth.

Reply

John Doe

7:14 pm on Sunday, September 23, 2012

Given that 47% are living off the federal state

including 25% which are unemployed probably because the 1% send their jobs to China, Robots and low pay countries?

Including 30% of Americans that are living off the military industrial complex ?

I can understand that those 30% must have the US go waste ammunitions, vehicles, and armament in some countries so their business strive while they keep their jobs secure, living off government contracts ...

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

7:15 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

maxine, you're right. I said, "Joe Dygas, some naive folks like myself think that getting a good education is a good thing in and of itself. I'm not rich because I got an Ivy League education."

I was wrong. I should have said that I feel intellectually and spiritually enriched because I got an Ivy League education, but I do not possess a lot of money.

I got to hear lectures by Carl Sagan and other outstanding professors. I like learning, and learning is a lifelong process. I enjoy reading and learning about other people.

Raising children was/is probably the most challenging things I've ever done in my life. I didn't have good parents myself, so having poor role models makes it very tough to do the right thing when you're frustrated. What I've tried to do is be a "good enough parent," in the words of Bruno Bettelheim, and give my kids the most love and nurturing as well as the best advice from life experience that I'm capable of.

Maxine, you've raised children who went to college. That's an achievement in and of itself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

8:06 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Maria don't take me the wrong way, an education is a wonderful thing to have. I made my choice when I was 16 that all I ever wanted to do in life is get married, and have babies. In fact I told my then boyfriend that I did'nt want a career that I wanted to stay home raise our children and after 40 yrs of marriage that is exactly what I did. I was born to be a mother and that is why it is so hurtful to me when I think about abortion.

Comment_arrow

Kurt B.

8:12 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

+1 for Maxines reply !!! This is a very important part of what makes America such a good place. A stay-at-home Mom is one of the most valuable resources we have.

Maria Houser Conzemius

7:18 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

John Doe, thanks for coming in to remind us of the wealthiest 1% of Americans like Mitt Romney who got rich buying factories in China and shipping jobs overseas. He also got rich by buying American companies, forcing those companies to borrow huge amounts of money, driving them into bankruptcy, and then firing 30,000 workers at a time. The companies he bought often suffered. Only a few survived, like Staples, which offers low-wage jobs with few if any benefits.

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

9:17 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Maria why don't you tell us all the good and wonderful things Obama has accomplished in life other than lying, buying and cheating his way into the white house four years ago? He was a community organizer. I lived in Chicago for ten years and had never heard of him before he got elected. That is pathetic.

Keith Best

7:35 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

What makes people think a president who spent most of his FIRST TERM as a US Senator campaigning for another office, knows what he is doing? The man has never run anything.

More people are out of work now then when Obama took office. And some want to re-elect him??? WTF?

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

8:12 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Keith Best, not me. Obama certainly wasn't my first choice. He was my last choice ahead of Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM). However, despite Obama's coddling of Wall Street, failure to indict a single corporate criminal, and failure to indict a single Bush43 administration war criminal, I'm going to hold my nose and vote for him.

Mitt Romney is so rich he has no clue how the rest of us live. He thinks that if kids want to go to college, they should "borrow money from their parents." In his world, maybe. My parents gave me a blanket to take with me to college. My father quit work and went to the same university I did. After I left home, sometimes my brother and sister didn't have enough to eat. My father accepted a Thorgrad Fellowship to do his post-doc in Sweden, and my parents weren't allowed to work in Sweden.

Mitt Romney is a sociopathic predator who "enjoy[s] firing people."

I think Barack Obama has some idea of how the rest of us live and wants to get as far away from an economically marginal life as fast as he can.

We have to vote for the lesser of two evils. I'm voting for Obama in the hopes he grows a pair in his second term.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kurt B.

8:24 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

@ Maria - I really think Obama is the wrong way to go. Not only does he not have any business sense, he is a pretty smooth liar. And, one would have to question why we even have this guy as President. He came back to the US to attend college as a foreign student under a different name ( I was born outside of the US but I attended school here as a naturalized American with my same name). He admittedly had dealings in dope and cocaine , probably jailable offenses that he somehow escaped. He is taking us down the wrong path and somehow, we all have got to see this is hurting the country. Horribly.

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

9:23 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Mitt Romney has penty of money that he earned, I am not rich but I don't berate people who are. I think its wonderful that other people can live a good life and have alot of money and yes money helps with every phase of life, but the ones who keep complaing about Romney having so much of it are just jealous of his success. And by the way he didn't start out rich and neither did his wife, they worked hard for thier money and were smart about investing it in the right places. Kudos to them. Obama has money too, except his came from the co called stimulus!

maxine weimer

8:19 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

Keith I have to agree with you that Obama didn't have what it takes to be president. The only good thing he had and still has is his smoothe way of talking. But this is a loosing battle when you try to get any democrat to see things from the other perspective. They are blindsided by the light of Obamas mouth. He is being told what to say every step of the way, thats why its so hard for him to speak without the teleprompter.He isn't a genius, he is the puppet..

Reply

maxine weimer

9:07 am on Monday, September 24, 2012

And Maria, Romney dosen't "enjoy" fireing people, that was his job at the time, but if he is elected you better believe there will be plenty of fireing

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

1:18 pm on Monday, September 24, 2012

Maxine, I'm happy that your life turned out so well. I'm glad you enjoy your children and grandchildren. Life is what you make of it.

Reply

maxine weimer

9:13 am on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Maria I am one of the lucky ones because I had parents who loved and guided me in the right direction, a husband for 40 years who supports me and still loves me after all these years and 4 wonderful kids and 8 fantastic grandkids who all have my heart. I wouldn't trade any of them for anything. I only wish other women could see how precious life really is and not treat it as if it were a candy wrapper on the floor.

Reply

Charlotte G.

12:56 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

maxine, you may accuse me of making no sense in my postings to you. Fine. But, while I make no sense, intentional or not, to your views, well, you are the epitome of senselessness. It doesn't take long on this blog to see how your views only tend to rabble rouse, for whatever issue, and purpose of yours. You, while being passionate in your varied views, just reminds me of the need for your kind to move east, way east. Like to other countries where women's rights are not so secure as ours. Nothing to do with abortion, btw, or the hcm paying for contraception or not, or the other social issues here, not to mention the economy, maybe?...BUT, your backwards views, at your age are, well, just like a candy wrapper on the floor. Wow! I saw this analogy from you before, and I was floored. You are precious!

Reply

Charlotte G.

12:58 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Oh, maxine, I used to think just the Dems could truly be so mean as you in getting their views across, but, I see you and yours are only trying to catch up. Good luck!

Reply
Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

10:30 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012

Charlotte why am I being so mean?

Comment_arrow

maxine weimer

2:59 pm on Monday, October 8, 2012

Charlotte...why do you always say "you and yours" because I am only one, there are no others here with me. I just don't understand some of the verbage you use.

Charlotte G.

1:44 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

maxine, what is your view of independents in this election? Is there a place in either party for them? If not, how will both major parties, at this late stage, try to win them over to one side or another? Is it too late? Please, tell me, and mine...

Reply

maxine weimer

9:10 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Charlotte, there is absolutely a place for Independents. They affiliate themselves with neither the Dems or Repubs and make their decisions as to which candidate makes a better fit for them. They will decide which candidate has better views for their way of life and they don't always vote for the same party. This opposite of me because I vote Republican straight across the board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlotte G.

2:15 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

maxine, thanks for saying there is a place in this election now, for independents. I do not need a mini-history lesson at all, as you seem to think, in trying to define independent voters. Geeze louise! My views have changed, from one party to another, and I'm firmly not in either, but not sadly so...As always, I can't see why voting a straight ticket, is a good thing, ever. Unless those who do so, with so many blinders on....are just voting, well, blindly.

Joe Dygas

9:39 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I early voted yesterday in Iowa and went with the whole Republican Ticket. It is time for real hope and change for policies of substance and not socialism. MR exposed obama's domestic policies for the failures that they are and will in upcoming debates expose his failed foreign policies. For example, the withdrawl from Iraq has allowed Iran to funnel weapons and ammo thru Iraq to the Syrian government which by anyone's standards has been committing genocide of its own people. Obama's policies in Libya and incompetance by sec. clinton led to the death of a US Ambassador and others. Sadly .
Now is time for change. Rise up Independants and show yourselves as a voice for change.
Remember in November, Vote NObama, NOclinton, Nodimorats...amen.

Reply

M. Sokoll

10:21 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Joe, I agree with you. Not only that, frrom what I read he has a number of UN treaties to foist on the United States and other hard working northern hemisphere countries that would transfer large sums of our hard earned money to third world dictators ( not their people). Also why else would someone want a private gun ownership ban other than to prevent overthrow of nonrepresentative govermnemts?

Reply

Joe Dygas

10:48 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

There is no doubt when obama was elected no one knew just how far to the left he really was thanks to the worthless biased news media. He has been making deals with left wing communist and socialist regimes everywhere. His involvement with the UN has been especially insidious and odious. Since the US is running a trillion dollar deficit for many years into the future, it seems appropriate to put a stop to foreign aid to all these unfriendly, unreliable, unsupportive islamic nations in the middle east. Obama and clinton have avoided conflict with Iran and Syria to say nothing of Libya. Had he not withdrawn troops from Iraq we might have had some influence there. But not now. It is the same old story with the democrats. They have this world socialist view of everything even to the demise of their own country.
Remember in November!

Reply

maxine weimer

12:16 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I also think we have to do whatever it takes to have a more balanced and truthful media. The coverage is so left wing biased that we might be better off with no coverage at all. The media needs to be held responsible lawfully for the lies they tell

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Todd Richissin

1:34 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

To All: I've deleted a number of comments that violate Patch's Term of Service. In a nutshell, those terms are: Be Civil. Period. We at Patch have received complaints from readers who are tired of the name-calling posts and general nastiness of a few of you. You likely know who you are. If one more post goes up from you that involves name calling or is otherwise violates our Terms of Service, we'll take the next steps to ensure that Patch remains a forum for CIVIL community interaction. That can include revoking Patch accounts and blocking IP addresses.

Reply

David Leonard

3:16 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Todd, please follow through with your threat. The no name-calling rule goes farther to ensure civil debate than any other single thing you can do. I've been about to go down that name-calling road myself but didn't because I remembered the rule.

Reply

Maria Houser Conzemius

4:25 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

+1, Todd Richissin and David Leonard! I embrace the new policy and think that rational people will be more likely to comment with a few rules of engagement.

Reply

maxine weimer

7:19 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Ok, I will also play by the rules but there are also those who push your buttons just to get a reaction.

Reply

Troy Murphy

12:59 am on Wednesday, October 10, 2012

What 5 trillion? The goverenment took in 1.2 trillion dollars in 2012 in federal income tax not total revenue, income tax. 20% of 1.2 trillion is 240 billion. A president serves 4 years so 240 billion times 4 years equals roughly 960 billion dollars or if we assume a growth in income tax that would equal roughly 1 trillion dollars. This also does not take into account any revenue increase due to increased economic activity that can be attributed to the tax cut nor the fact that Romney has stated numerous times that he would close loopholes etc that now exist. That is why Romney says he doesn't have a 5 trillion dollar tax increase and why Obama is a liar.

Basically What Romney said on the ACA is that he would require companies to cover pre-existing conditions as long as their was no lapse in coverage, the difference is it would be up to you to make sure your coverage didn't lapse instead of the federal government baby-sitting you. The second part of his plan was already law before Obamacare. Kids were covered until they were 21 or no longer a DEPENDENT. Here is an interesting fact, I have an employee who has a child who has graduated from college, she is 22, works full time and lives with her significant other. She has insurance available through work. She will be on my insurance for another 4 years at no cost to her. Because our plan has 2 tiers, single and family, she is staying on her parents insurance but what that means is everyone else is paying for her.

Reply

Leave a comment