For Iowa Evangelicals, Values Compete with Gingrich Electability
The voter base that gave Huckabee an Iowa victory in 2008 is considering whether electability trumps values.
In the past, Newt Gingrich was not always the most pro-life of politicians.
He has stated he wouldn't ban abortion in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is at risk, and he has also supported providing federal money for embryonic stem cell research. And even without the abortion question, Gingrich is not your typical family-man candidate for evangelicals, with his history of mulitple marriages and affairs.
What means more to you, values or electability? Tell us in the comments section below.
But Gingrich has been reaching out to the Christian right. He attended a Family Values forum and remains in play as one of four viable candidates being considered for enorsement by The Family Leader, a prominent Iowa Christian group.
Next week, Gingrich will join Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum in Des Moines for a Dec. 14 screening of The Gift of Life, a documentary about abortion issues that will be hosted by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.
Huckabee, of course, rode to an Iowa caucus victory four years ago, largely on a wave of evangelical support.
But was it Huckabee's values that gained him so many votes? Some Iowa evangelicals said a candidate needs more than a clean values track-record to win.
"He was very likeable and charismatic," Judd Saul, founder of the Cedar Valley Tea Party and self-identified member of the Christian right, said. "He had a preacher's charisma, and that's what won people over."
He said such considerations -- which candidate performs best and which candidate is considered electable -- might play heavily into who Iowa evangelicals support this time around.
"With Gingrich it's a mixed bag," he said. "The leadership wants to endorse a candidate that will win (against President Obama). Overall, the Christian base is on the side of Michele Bachmann or Rick Santorum on principals. But their question is what is electable."
Personally, however, he said he was more concerned with values than perceived electability.
"We live in a society where everyone judges talent. We sit in our living rooms and watch American Idol, and we become a society that judges what is talent," he said. "We're looking at people for the wrong principals."
He said he was not alone in his beliefs.
"The really hardcore right is hardcore Santorum," he said.
If that's the case, the question may be whether that "really hardcore right," is large enough to make an impact.
Today, the Rev. Cary K. Gordon, a Sioux City evangelical leader who was prominent in the defeat of three Iowa Supreme Court justices over gay marriage, endorsed Santorum. Prior to August's Iowa Straw Poll, 100 evangelical church leaders endorsed Bachmann.
Those two candidates, though, have been polling in single digits, leaving Gingrich as the "not Romney" candidate with the highest poll numbers.
Steve Scheffler, president of the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition and the state Republican National Committee for Iowa, seemed more concerned with not electing Mitt Romney than with Gingrich's values.
He said Gingrich's past statements on abortion didn't bother him because they were less extreme than Romney's.
"He (Gingrich) is still stongly pro-life. Mitt Romney has been all over the map," he said. "Post Iowa, if it comes down to Newt Gingrich versus Mitt Romney, the vast majority of Christians will get behind Newt Gingrich."
He stopped short of saying Gingrich would garner enough of the right's support to win the caucus.
"At the present time I don't see the Christian right coalescing around one candidate," he said. "I don’t know what will happen here in Iowa."
The Iowa caucuses are January 3. Patch will have live coverage of the results as they come in.
Maureen Doherty
2:51 pm on Friday, December 2, 2011
If electability trumps morals, values and character then the Evangelicals sure need to go home and be quiet about what they call moral issues like gay marriage and women's health. I hear the silence, sweet.
Kathy Smelser
10:05 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011
i totally agree
Charles Davis
12:18 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011
Romney is a great family man, has never been accused of any improprieties or anything unethical. He has been shown to be an excellent business administrator.
Mitt is on his 3rd wife, having left one while she was fighting life threatening cancer, he is the only speaker of the house to ever be disciplined and fined ($300,000.00) for ethical violations, I could go on.
This simply proves that Evangelicals are more concerned with Mitt Romney's Mormon faith than they are winning the White House.
As a moderate Republican I wish Iowa was not the lead off state. :-(
BTW - Mitt has flipped on many issues. However, just like how Ronald Reagan was once a leader in the Democratic party, and matured as he got older becoming a conservative, so has Romney. Rather than criticizing people who flip, Evangelicals should hope for people to flip from liberal positions to conservative and give them praise.
Stephen Schmidt
12:25 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011
"Mitt is on his 3rd wife, having left one while she was fighting life threatening cancer, he is the only speaker of the house to ever be disciplined and fined ($300,000.00) for ethical violations, I could go on."
You mean Newt. correct?
David Leonard
5:19 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011
If evangelicals can back Newt just because he claims to have found the Lord (or whatever it is he claims), where does personal responsibility come in?
Todd Richissin
11:01 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011
David: You bring up what I've long thought is one of those great, tough questions. That is, does there come a point when "personal redemption" just isn't enough to overcome one's personal history? And how do we distinguish personal redemption from political opportunity?
Maine Halyard
9:36 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Fortunately, Todd, we have a choice: we can get integrity and electability if we all choose the only guy on the stage with a record of credibility and honesty. Ron Paul.